There's a character in the Ramayana most people forget.

Her name is Manthara. A hunchbacked maid in the palace. Small, jealous, manipulative. She whispers in the wrong queen's ear at the wrong moment, and that whisper sends Rama into fourteen years of exile. And then she disappears. The grief of Dasharatha takes over. The drama of Rama leaving Ayodhya takes over. Depending on which version you read, Manthara either never appears again or shows up briefly at the very end to receive Rama's grace for a second or two. The person who triggered the entire epic walks into the shadows and is barely mentioned again.

She looks like the cause. She isn't. Narada's curse, Shiva's boons, Ravana's rise — all of it was already in motion. Manthara is just the moment it becomes visible.

But without her, no exile. No Hanuman, no Lanka, no return, no Ram Rajya. An epic that has shaped millions of lives for thousands of years pivots on a single petty act by a forgettable person you stop thinking about a chapter later.

I've been thinking about her lately because most of us have a Manthara or two in our story. Not necessarily a person. Sometimes it's a job that ended, a bet that didn't pay off, a friendship that turned, a relationship that didn't last. Something that looked like a derailment in the moment and quietly redirected the next decade of your life.

The trap, when you go back to look at one of those moments, is that there are only two clean stories available.

Story one: it was a bad thing that happened to me. They were the villain, I was the casualty, I survived it. This is satisfying for a while. It lets you tell a clean version at dinner. It stops working the moment you notice you are, in many ways, a sharper version of yourself because of what happened. If it was just bad, where did all that come from.

Story two: it was meant to be. They were my teacher. Everything happens for a reason. This one is generous and grown-up and very meditation-retreat. It lasts until you remember the actual people and the actual things, and realize you've quietly turned a flawed human into a wise sage who showed up to deliver a lesson. They didn't. It was just a thing that happened.

This is where Manthara gets interesting. The tradition refuses both stories. It doesn't redeem her — there's no chapter where it turns out she meant well. But it also doesn't let you file her under villain and move on, because without her there's no epic. Dharma moves through her flaw. Not because it's virtuous. In spite of it.

You can feel the discomfort with this. In Ramanand Sagar's Ramayan, the follow-up Luv Kush series included a scene of Rama, Sita and Lakshmana meeting Manthara after Rama returns and becomes king — a small redemption beat where she receives his grace. That scene was filmed, aired, and then quietly deleted from later releases. It's surfaced back on YouTube, if you want to watch it. The fact that it was made and then cut is the whole tension in two minutes of footage. We want to give her an arc. We also can't quite let her have one. The ledger keeps trying to close, and something keeps pulling it back open.

The catalyst's moral status and your response's moral weight are two separate accounts. They don't need to reconcile. You don't have to forgive a thing to use what came through it. You don't have to condemn it to honor what you're building now. Both ledgers can stay open. Both can stay messy. That's allowed.

The part that actually changed something for me is who the Ramayana remembers, and who it quietly leaves behind. Bharata is the one we remember. He learns what happened, refuses the throne, places Rama's sandals on it instead, and rules as a regent waiting for his brother to return. Lakshmana is the one we remember. He hears the news and walks into the forest beside Rama without a second thought. They were both furious with Kaikeyi — Bharata says some pretty cutting things to his mother — but they don't get stuck there. They name the wrong, feel the anger, and keep walking. They don't spend a single shloka relitigating Manthara. They look at the new ground and ask what it requires of them.

The ones who don't fare as well are the ones who get caught in the emotion. Dasharatha never recovers and dies of grief. The subjects of Ayodhya weep, follow Rama to the edge of the forest, and sit there in mourning. They're not wrong to grieve. But they're also not the story. The story belongs to the ones who accept the terrain and start walking.

I don't think any of us land on a clean version of the catalysts in our lives. Whether they were villains or teachers or just things that happened at the wrong time. And I'm starting to think that's the point. The asking is the trap. The ledger doesn't close.

What we can do is what Bharata and Lakshmana did. Note the catalyst. Refuse to redeem it. Refuse to vilify it. Be angry where anger is honest. And start walking.

The catalyst was the event. The next ten years are the story.

Only one of those compounds.

I Pebble You,
Ankit

"I Pebble You" is a heartfelt collection of thoughtful moments — articles, memes, videos, and insights —that spark joy and connection. Inspired by how penguins gift pebbles to their loved ones, it’s a space to pause, reflect, and share. Subscribe to receive these meaningful pebbles in your inbox, and add your own to help build something bigger — because together, we create more thoughtful connections.

👉 Read the previous pebble "The Ticket I Never Bought"
👉 Read the original pebble "I Pebble You"